Current Issue
Volume: 38
Number: 4
Index: December 2010
Clinical Focus:Respiratory Care
Editorial Calendar
December 2010
Clinical Focus: Respiratory Medicine
  • Asthma and the athlete
    • Vocal cord dysfunction
    • Exercise-induced asthma
    • Exercise-induced bronchospasm
  • COPD
    • Obesity and COPD
    • Relationship between COPD and nutrition intake
  • Treatment options for steroid-induced osteoporosis in men
  • Treatments for asthma
    • Bronchodilators, anticholinergics
    • Corticosteroids
    • Metered-dose vs other types of inhalers
  • Respiratory infections in winter sports athletes
  • Asthma in elite athletes
  • Pulmonary rehabilitation and physical activity
  • Fitness and long-term oxygen therapy/lung transplantation
  • Airflow function and the metabolic syndrome
View More
Submission deadline: November 05
Fast-Track deadline: November 15
Fast-Track peer review is available for those papers requiring immediate review (for an additional fee). Complete peer review is finalized in 1-2 weeks and comments are provided to the author within 72 hours of their receipt by the editorial office. Authors are asked to submit a revised manuscript within 10-12 days. Accepted manuscripts are processed within 2-3 weeks, published online within 3 business days of final author approval, and in print in the next available issue.
Submit your FAST-TRACK manuscript online today. It's fast, it's easy! Just follow the detailed instructions, fill in all the required fields, and upload your manuscript.
Get started NOW!
[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

Document Delivery Services

[email protected]

[email protected] [email protected]

[email protected]

Managing Director:
John Elduff
Phone: 610-889-3732
Fax: 1-866-297-3168
[email protected]

General Information
Phone: 610-889-3730
Fax: 1-866-297-3168
1235 Westlakes Drive
Suite 320
Berwyn, PA 19312
doi: 10.3810/psm.2010.06.1786
The Physician and Sportsmedicine: Volume 38: No.2
Long-Term Outcome of Patients Treated Surgically for Traumatic Knee Dislocation:
Does the Injury Pattern Matter?
Michael T. Hirschmann, MD; Matthias D. Meier, MD; Felix Amsler, MSc; And Niklaus F. Friederich, MD
Abstract: Aims To examine the difference in outcomes of patients treated surgically for traumatic knee dislocation with regard to different injury patterns. Methods All patients who underwent reconstruction/repair of the cruciates and primary complete repair of collaterals, posterolateral, and posteromedial corner structures were allocated to 3 groups (group A: bicruciate injury with associated medial side injury [n = 31]; group B: bicruciate injury with associated lateral injury [n = 20]; group C: bicruciate injury with associated medial and lateral injury [n = 23]). Outcome was assessed at a mean of 12 years postoperatively using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Short Form-36 (SF-36) health survey, Lysholm score, Tegner score, visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, and Knee Society score. Anterior-posterior laxity was also measured (KT1000™ arthrometer; Medmetric Corp., San Diego, CA), and Pearson’s correlation was used to compute associations between variables (P < 0.05) Results The mean time to return to work was 6 ± 4 months in group A, 13 ± 19 months in group B, and 11 ± 12 months in group C. At final follow-up, 7 patients had a pain VAS of > 3 (group A: 6 patients; group B: 0 patients; group C: 1 patient). Seven patients could not flex their knee > 110° (group A: 4 patients; group B: 0 patients; group C: 3 patients). Eighteen patients (24%) presented with an extension deficit of > 5°. Valgus stress testing was > 3 mm in 12 patients (group A, 3 patients; group B, 4 patients; group C: 5 patients). Varus stress testing was > 3 mm in 9 patients (group A: 4 patients; group B: 3 patients; group C: 2 patients). The dial test at 30° showed < 6° (normal) and 6° to 10° (nearly normal) in 64 patients, and > 10° (abnormal) in 10 patients (group A: 4 patients; group B: 2 patients; group C: 4 patients). At 90° flexion, the difference was < 10° in 70 patients and > 10° in 4 patients (group A, 1 patient; group B: 1 patient; group C: 2 patients). Normal/nearly normal IKDC score values were found in 19 patients in group A, in 12 patients in group B, and in 14 patients in group C. There were no significant differences in outcome between the groups, except patients with an injury of the lateral collateral ligament and/or the peroneal nerve who had a greater need for workers compensation (P > 0.01). Conclusion Early complete 1-stage reconstruction/repair showed good subjective and functional results with restoration of working capacity, independent from the location of associated injuries (medial, lateral, and medial and lateral). A peroneal nerve lesion resulted in significantly poorer outcome.

Keywords: multiligament knee injury; traumatic knee dislocation; treatment; long-term outcome; function; injury pattern


Back to the table of contents for the June 2010 issue