The Physician and Sportsmedicine
Menubar Home Journal Personal Health Resource Center CME Advertiser Services About Us

Refining Rehabilitation With Proprioception Training: Expediting Return to Play

Edward R. Laskowski, MD; Karen Newcomer-Aney, MD; Jay Smith, MD

THE PHYSICIAN AND SPORTSMEDICINE - VOL 25 - NO. 10 - OCTOBER 97


In Brief: Although definitions of proprioception—sense of joint position—may vary, its importance in preventing and rehabilitating athletic injury remains constant: Restoring it after injury allows the body to maintain stability and orientation during static and dynamic activities. Any type of joint injury can interrupt position sense. Proprioceptive programs need to be tailored to the individual patient, but exercises can include balance training, closed-kinetic-chain exercises such as the leg press or single-leg hops, back-strengtheners, and quadruped stabilization. Sport-specific training is also crucial in regaining proprioception; an example is defensive slide drills in basketball.

Impaired joint "position sense" is overlooked in many rehabilitation programs and may be a major risk factor for recurrent injuries after the integrity of the muscles and ligaments has been restored (1). Physicians, therefore, need a general understanding of the afferent proprioceptive system, its importance to joint integrity, and how to emphasize it during rehabilitation and training.

The terms "proprioceptive deficit," "proprioceptive training," and "proprioceptive rehabilitation" are being used increasingly in sports medicine. Despite the popularity of this terminology, multiple definitions for proprioception exist. Many researchers have defined proprioception as the afferent input of joint position sense (ie, awareness of position or movement), whereas others consider proprioception in a broader sense that includes neuromuscular control. In addition to detection of an afferent stimulus, neuromuscular control includes processing the stimulus and a reactive efferent output mediated via the neuromuscular system (see "Proprioception: General Concepts," below).

Proprioceptive training and rehabilitation attempt to maximize protection from injury and provide optimal functional restoration. Joint laxity itself does not necessarily predict the presence or severity of functional instability (2). Studies (3,4) have shown that proprioception-based rehabilitation programs improve objective measurements of functional status independent of changes in joint laxity. These studies also showed that proprioception can be improved through training.

Injury and Proprioceptive Loss

Injury to a joint may cause direct or indirect alterations in sensory information provided by mechanoreceptors (see "The Role of Mechanoreceptors," page 95). Direct trauma may lead to ligament and capsule tearing, which may rupture the nerve fibers because they have less tensile strength than collagen. The consequent destruction of the messages to and from the joint receptors then causes "deafferentation" and proprioceptive loss (5-7).

An indirect disruption may result from the effects of an effusion or hemarthrosis. Receptors are still intact, but they provide incorrect information because of the pressure stimulus (5). The effort of the quadriceps (particularly the oblique fibers of the vastus medialis) can be inhibited up to 60% by a small (20-mL) knee infusion (8). This inhibition can deactivate the neuromuscular pathway and result in insufficient or uncoordinated muscle group activation.

Leach (9) has shown that the longer an athlete is unable to compete, the greater the loss of proprioception. Thus, it is important to control the inflammatory phase of acute injuries via early use of PRICE (protection of the joint, relative rest, icing, compression, and elevation of the limb above heart level) so that the patient can return to play as early as possible.

Regardless of the mechanism of injury, any damage to muscle spindles, Golgi tendon organs, or joint receptors has a significant impact on function and dynamic joint stability (see "Dynamic Joint Stability," below). In fact, these effects may be comparable to the deficit from the actual anatomic disruption of the ligament or tendon.

Ankle Proprioception

Freeman and Wyke (10) in 1967 demonstrated that the tibial, sural, and deep peroneal nerves terminate in mechanoreceptors in the capsule and ligaments of the ankle. In describing ankle injuries, they used the term "functional instability" to describe the results of deafferentation and the higher incidence of recurrent sprains in patients with previous ankle sprains. Injury results in deafferentation, and patients report "looseness" without gross mechanical instability. This functional instability can impair performance and increase the risk of reinjury.

Proprioceptive deficits have been documented in injured ankles via two methods: joint position sense and stabilometry. Glencross and Thornton (11) were the first to demonstrate proprioceptive deficits in patients who had a history of recurrent ankle sprains. A correlation was made between the severity of ankle injury and the inability to accurately reproduce joint positions.

In stabilometry, quantitative measures of equilibrium using changes in postural sway are obtained. Using stabilometry as a measure of functional ankle instability, Tropp et al (12) found that soccer players who had an increase in postural sway greater than 2 standard deviations above normal had a statistically significant higher risk of injury.

In a prospective study of the value of wobble board training and injury reduction, Tropp et al (13) demonstrated improved stabilometry and also reduced injury rates in previously injured soccer players given a 10-week treatment with ankle disk training. Such training may also affect more proximal joints: Proprioceptive training with five different phases of balance training on various boards that challenged the balance system was shown to significantly reduce the incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in soccer players (14).

Proprioception in Low-Back Pain

Several neurophysiologic studies suggest a close relationship between back pain and various aspects of proprioception, and mechanoreceptors have been identified in the back. Yamashita et al (15) found that facet joints in rabbits contained two types of mechanosensitive afferent units, one believed to serve as a nociceptor and one as a proprioceptor.

Research suggests that patients who have low-back pain may have impairments in certain aspects of proprioception that can persist when proprioception is not specifically addressed. Nies and Sinnott (16) found that subjects who had low-back pain demonstrated significantly greater postural sway and were less likely to be able to balance in challenging positions than subjects who had no back pain. Based on such information, empiric programs have been developed on the premise that patients who have low-back pain experience an alteration in afferent feedback that may lead to poor control of posture and movement (17).

Some research (18) (including K.N. and E.R.L., unpublished data) suggests that, compared with postural sway, position sense may not be the most sensitive measure of proprioception in the low back, since pain may provide a feedback stimulus and actually enhance performance on tests such as replication of back position. Thus, reliable methods for measuring other aspects of proprioception and impairment of the afferent system need to be identified.

Specific Exercises

Despite the absence of definitive knowledge of discrete aspects of the proprioceptive system, rehabilitation programs can be designed to challenge, enhance, and improve this system. In addition, uninjured athletes may benefit from incorporating proprioceptive exercise into their training program. Healthy throwing athletes, for example, have been shown to have impaired ability to detect passive motion in their throwing shoulders (19).

Prophylactic programs designed to comprehensively address proprioceptive aspects of the joint may protect against injury (14). Specific proprioceptive training can help to fine-tune the afferent-efferent arcs. Exercises should include repetitive, consciously mediated movement sequences performed slowly and deliberately as well as sudden, externally applied perturbations of joint position to initiate reflex, "subconscious" muscle contraction (20). It may be impossible to single out specific mechanoreceptors to train, but certain activities can enhance mechanoreceptor activation and therefore affect the central nervous system pathway.

To improve the proprioceptive system in dynamic joint stability, it must be challenged. In injury, "pain free" does not mean "cured," and unless the proprioceptive deficit is addressed, complete rehabilitation has not been accomplished. In addition, correction of a damaged static restraint (eg, surgical correction of mechanically disrupted tissue) may not maximize the afferent neuromuscular input needed to enhance dynamic joint stability. A recent study (21) has shown that ACL reconstruction did not improve the threshold of perception of passive knee motion. Mechanically stable joints are not necessarily functionally stable, especially in less constrained systems like the shoulder.

Balance training. One major category of proprioceptive exercise is balance training. These exercises help to train the proprioceptive system in a mostly static activity. In the lower extremities, activities can include one-legged standing balance exercises, progressive use of wobble board exercises (figure 1), and tandem exercises in which a postural challenge can be applied to the individual by the therapist or exercise partner (eg, challenges to stability while standing on one leg).

[FIGURE 1]

Kinetic chain exercises. Closed-kinetic-chain exercises (those in which movement at one joint produces predictable movement at other joints, usually involving axial forces) challenge the dynamic and reflexive aspects of proprioception in the legs and feet. The lower extremities function in a closed-chain manner during sports and daily life activities, so these exercises will facilitate the proper neuromuscular engrams. Examples include the leg press, squat, circle running, figure eights, single-leg hops, vertical jumps, lateral bounds, one-legged long jumps, and carioca (crossover walking).

In the upper extremities, therapist application of graded, multidirectional manual resistance can provide proprioceptive feedback in a closed-chain fashion. Open-chain manual resistance exercises with rhythmic stabilization (rapid change in direction of applied pressure) are also considered proprioceptively enriched. In either case, resistance can be modified, depending on pain, as the patient progresses (figure 2).

[FIGURE 2]

Focus on the back. Dynamic lumbar muscle stabilization (figure 3) has become the most popular method of proprioceptive retraining for the low back (22). This involves coordinated strengthening of the abdominal, back, and trunk muscles in functional movement planes. The lower back is often considered the "weak link" in the movement chain. Dynamic lumbar stabilization exercises are designed to progressively challenge this segment to promote successive adaptation, with an emphasis on balanced load distribution via a neutral pelvis, optimal skeletal alignment, and balanced strength.

[FIGURE 3]

Shoulder care. Proprioceptive challenge can be applied to the shoulder using techniques such as quadruped stabilization on a balance board (figure 4), which can stimulate proper stabilization of the scapula in a closed-kinetic-chain position. This technique can encourage proper scapulothoracic and glenohumeral motion. This can be effective early in rehabilitation after an injury such as a rotator cuff tendinitis, because co-contraction (coordinated contraction of agonist and antagonist muscle groups) provides stability to the joint and is better tolerated than open-chain upper-extremity exercise. Wall push-ups are also useful and can be proprioceptively enhanced by having a physical therapist or resistance band provide resistance to the patient's back.

[FIGURE 4]

Sport-specific maneuvers. Sports specificity should also be incorporated. Sport-specific exercises will serve to "hard wire" the proprioceptive pathways and solidify a neuromuscular engram specific to these activities. Rehabilitation is incomplete until maneuvers specific to the sport and the athlete's position in the sport can be performed maximally and without pain or loss of function. These skills should be tested before the patient returns to competition.

Starting sport-specific maneuvers with weighted resistance (eg, swinging a weighted tennis racket or baseball bat), could produce suboptimal neuromuscular engram patterning because the force of gravity hinders horizontal movement. Rather, the patient should first build a core program of symmetrical strength and stability in the upper and lower extremities. He or she then progresses to skill-specific practice (figure 5). For example, a football halfback can practice timed runs in tires or a rope maze; a baseball player can practice fielding and base running; a basketball player can practice lay-ups, perimeter shooting, and defensive slide drills.

[FIGURE 5]

Outcome analysis. Often with these exercises, we can measure only the results of proprioception—ie, dynamic stability—but from these measures we can infer how interventions affect the proprioceptive system. For example, one study (23) simulated ankle sprains on normal individuals with a platform that has a hinged trapdoor that produces sudden lateral ankle inversion of 20°. It revealed that after 8 weeks of using a wobble board, a "remodulation" of the ankle group muscles occurred to provide maximum dynamic ankle stability: Muscles that would create a greater inversion moment were slowed, which indirectly improved the efficiency of the peroneus longus to decelerate the foot during unexpected ankle inversion.

Research Needs

Focusing on aspects of neuromuscular function, such as dynamic joint stability, can help us study and design interventions that help to maximize neuromuscular function in sports and daily life. Given the significant data that point to the integral role of proprioception, further research on dynamic joint stability is necessary. In addition, because proprioceptive deficits exist after an injury—even in mechanically stable joints—research is needed to elucidate how these deficits can be remedied to improve function and prevent reinjury.

References

  1. Bunton EE, Pitney WA, Kane AW, et al: The role of limb torque, muscle action and proprioception during closed kinetic chain rehabilitation of the lower extremity. J Ath Training 1993;28(1):10-20
  2. Snyder-Mackler L, Fitzgerald GK, Bartolozzi AR III, et al: The relationship between passive joint laxity and functional outcome after anterior cruciate ligament injury. Am J Sports Med 1997;25(2):191-195
  3. Beard DJ, Dodd CA, Trundle HR, et al: Proprioception enhancement for anterior cruciate ligament deficiency: a prospective randomised trial of two physiotherapy regimes. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1994;76(4):654-659
  4. Ihara H, Nakayama A: Dynamic joint control training for knee ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 120216;14(4):309-315
  5. Schutte MJ, Happel LT: Joint innervation in joint injury. Clin Sports Med 1990;9(2):511-517
  6. DeCarlo MS, Talbot RW: Evaluation of ankle joint proprioception following injection of the anterior talofibular ligament. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 120216;8(2):70-75
  7. Freeman MA, Dean MR, Hanham IW: The etiology and prevention of functional instability of the foot. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1965;47:678-685
  8. Young A, Stokes M, Iles JF: Effects of joint pathology on muscle. Clin Orthop 120217;219(Jun):21-27
  9. Leach RE: Overall view of rehabilitation of the leg for running, in Mack RP (ed): Symposium on the Foot and Leg in Running Sports. St Louis, CV Mosby, 120212
  10. Freeman MA, Wyke B: Articular reflexes at the ankle joint: an electromyographic study of normal and abnormal influences on ankle-joint mechanoreceptors upon reflex activity in the leg muscles. Br J Surg 1967;54(12):990-1001
  11. Glencross D, Thornton E: Position sense following joint injury. J Sports Med Physical Fitness 1991;21(1):23-27
  12. Tropp H, Ekstrand J, Gillquist J: Stabilometry in functional instability of the ankle and its value in predicting injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc 120214;16(1):64-66
  13. Tropp H, Askling C, Gillquist J: Prevention of ankle sprains. Am J Sports Med 120215;13(4):259-262
  14. Caraffa A, Cerulli G, Projetti M, et al: Prevention of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in soccer: a prospective controlled study of proprioceptive training. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1996;4(1):19-21
  15. Yamashita T, Cavanaugh JM, el-Bohy AA, et al: Mechanosensitive afferent units in the lumbar facet joint. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1990;72(6):865-870
  16. Nies N, Sinnott PL: Variations in balance and body sway in middle-aged adults: subjects with healthy backs compared with subjects with low-back dysfunction. Spine 1991;16(3):325-330
  17. Bullock-Saxton JE, Janda V, Bullock MI: Reflex activation of gluteal muscles in walking: an approach to restoration of muscle function for patients with low-back pain. Spine 1993;18(6):704-708
  18. Parkhurst TM, Burnett CN: Injury and proprioception in the lower back. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1994;19(5):282-295
  19. Allegrucci M, Whitney SL, Lephart SM, et al: Shoulder kinesthesia in healthy unilateral athletes participating in upper extremity sports. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1995;21(4):220-226
  20. Hoffman M, Payne VG: The effects of proprioceptive ankle disk training on healthy subjects. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1995;21(2):90-93
  21. MacDonald PB, Hedden D, Pacin O, et al: Proprioception in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient and reconstructed knees. Am J Sports Med 1996;24(6):774-778
  22. Saal JA, Saal JS: Initial stage management of lumbar spine problems. Phys Med Rehabil Clin North Am 1991;2:187-203
  23. Sheth P, Yu B, Laskowski E, et al: Ankle disk training influences reaction times of selected muscles in a simulated ankle sprain. Am J Sports Med 1997;25(4):538-543


Proprioception: General Concepts

Proprioception is one of the somatic senses—nervous system functions that collect sensory information from the body but are not one of the special senses of sight, hearing, taste, touch, smell, or vestibular equilibrium. Classically, three somatic senses are described: pain, thermoreceptivity, and mechanoreceptivity, the latter of which includes tactile and position sense. Proprioception relates primarily to the position sense of mechanoreceptive sensation (see "The Role of Mechanoreceptors," below).

Proprioception encompasses two aspects of position sense: static and dynamic. Static sense provides us with conscious orientation of one body part to another. Dynamic sense gives the neuromuscular system feedback about the rate and direction of movement.

Thus, proprioception can be thought of as a complex neuromuscular process that involves both afferent input and efferent signals and allows the body to maintain stability and orientation during both static and dynamic activities. In general, it is the process by which the body can vary muscle contraction in immediate response to incoming information regarding external forces (1).

There also are two levels of proprioception: conscious (voluntary) and unconscious (reflex initiated). While conscious proprioception enables proper joint function in sports, activities, and occupational tasks, unconscious proprioception modulates muscle function and initiates reflexive stabilization of joints by way of the muscle receptors (2).

Using the knee as an example, the afferent-efferent pathway can be described as a neuromuscular servomechanism that modulates hamstring and quadriceps activity. The central nervous system processes afferent proprioceptive input by comparing actual with intended movement. The discrepancy between the two can then trigger efferent output to correct the error.

Brand (3) has questioned the traditional view of ligaments as merely mechanical restraints and speculates that the neurosensory importance of the ligaments may, in fact, approach that of their mechanical effect. Because voluntary movements initiated at the cerebral cortex may be too slow to prevent injury, it is speculated that short-loop or spinal reflexes may be capable of a more timely response. Triggering these protective spinal reflexes during an "at risk" maneuver may play an even greater role in joint stability than the voluntary response.

References

  1. Hoffman M, Payne VG: The effects of proprioceptive ankle disk training on healthy subjects. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1995;21(2):90-93
  2. Lephart S: Reestablishing proprioception, kinesthesia, joint position sense, and neuromuscular control in rehabilitation, in Prentice WE (ed): Rehabilitation Techniques in Sports Medicine. St Louis, CV Mosby, 1994
  3. Brand RA: Knee ligaments: a new view. J Biomech Eng 120216;108(2):106-110


The Role of Mechanoreceptors

Mechanoreceptors initiate the afferent loop of proprioceptive feedback to the brain. They are specialized end-organs (neurosensory cells) that convert a physical stimulus into a neurologic signal that can be deciphered by the central nervous system (CNS) to modulate joint position and movement (1). Mechanoreceptors have important roles in joint position sense as well as in controlling muscle tone and generating reflex response (2).

Each of the four mechanoreceptor types responds to different stimuli and gives specific afferent information that modifies neuromuscular function. For further delineation of the functions of each type of mechanoreceptor, Wyke (3) provides an excellent review.

There is no clear consensus about the location of the key afferent receptors that trigger dynamic joint stability. Currently, the important receptors are thought to be cutaneous, joint capsule, muscle, and ligamentous. Grouped in broader classes, the articular and muscle receptors are considered the two important mechanoreceptor classes in joint stability; they contribute to joint position sense. Articular receptors are located within the joint capsule, ligaments, and intra-articular structures such as the meniscus. Muscle receptors are found in the muscle spindle and the Golgi tendon organ and are important for both proprioception and motor control of the muscles (1).

The action of mechanoreceptors can be better understood by looking at ligamentous mechanoreceptors, which are found in connective tissue running parallel to the ligament fibers. All receptors need a stimulus to change their membrane potential, which then causes an action potential to travel to the CNS. It is speculated that longitudinal tension on a ligament results in compression of the connective tissue and stimulates the mechanoreceptors (2).

Mechanoreceptors can also be stimulated by muscle-length change, including the rate of change in tension and length. The mechanical deformation of a receptor stretches the membrane and opens the ion channel. This allows positively charged ions (Na+) into the cell, which creates a net depolarizing effect that generates a nerve receptor potential. Mechanoreceptors detect deformation of the receptor itself or of cells adjacent to the receptor (4).

References

  1. Schutte MJ, Happel LT: Joint innervation in joint injury. Clin Sports Med 1990;9(2):511-517
  2. Michelson JD, Hutchins C: Mechanoreceptors in human ankle ligaments. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1995;77(2):219-224
  3. Wyke B: Articular neurology: a review. Physiotherapy 1972;58(3):94-99
  4. Hoffman M, Payne VG: The effects of proprioceptive ankle disk training on healthy subjects. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1995;21(2):90-93


Dynamic Joint Stability

Dynamic joint stability can be defined as the ability of appropriately activated muscles to stabilize a joint. Proprioception is a key component of dynamic joint stability, because afferent input indirectly produces and modulates the efferent response that allows the neuromuscular system to maintain a balance of stability and mobility. In essence, dynamic joint stability is the "product" of the proprioceptive system.

Much of the research regarding proprioception as it relates to dynamic joint stability has focused on the knee. Palmer (1) theorized that ligaments supply the central nervous system with input that makes neuromuscular control of the knee possible.

Cohen and Cohen (2) espoused the idea of an "arthrokinetic reflex" and suggested that the origin of important afferent input was the knee capsule. They also postulated that maintaining quadriceps/hamstring tension balance was necessary for joint stability.

Solomonow et al (3) postulated that anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in humans interrupts the ACL-muscle reflex arc, triggering a second, slower pathway that originates from remaining muscle, capsule, and periarticular soft-tissue mechanoreceptors. This second pathway produces abnormal muscle activation patterns of the hamstrings and quadriceps, reducing dynamic knee stability.

Although a precise diagram of the afferent neural circuitry of dynamic joint control is not yet developed, the neuromuscular system has been shown to be capable of altering the strains imposed on the knee. For example, quadriceps contraction, which is driven by afferent information, has been shown to reduce the strain produced in the medial collateral ligament when a valgus force is applied (4). In addition, the stiffness of the medial knee can be increased up to 48% with contraction of the quadriceps and hamstrings (5).

References

  1. Palmer I: Plastic surgery of the ligaments of the knee. Acta Chir Scand 1944;91:37-48
  2. Cohen LA, Cohen ML: Arthrokinetic reflex of the knee. Am J Physiol 1956;184:433-437
  3. Solomonow M, Baratta R, Zhou BH, et al: The synergistic action of the anterior cruciate ligament and thigh muscles in maintaining joint stability. Am J Sports Med 120217;15(3):207-213
  4. White AA III, Raphael IG: The effect of quadriceps loads and knee position on strain measurements of the tibiocollateral ligament: an experimental study on human amputation specimens. Acta Orthop Scand 1972;43(3):176-187
  5. Goldfuss AJ, Morehouse CA, LeVeau BF: Effect of muscular tension on knee stability. Med Sci Sports 1973;5(4):267-271


Dr Laskowski is a consultant in the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and codirector of the Mayo Sports Medicine Center at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. He is also an associate professor at the Mayo Medical School in Rochester. Drs Newcomer-Aney and Smith are senior associate consultants in the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation at Mayo, staff physicians at the Mayo Sports Medicine Center, and assistant professors at the Mayo Medical School. Address correspondence to Edward R. Laskowski, MD, Dept of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Sports Medicine Center, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905.


RETURN TO OCTOBER 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS

HOME  |   JOURNAL  |   PERSONAL HEALTH  |   RESOURCE CENTER  |   CME  |   ADVERTISER SERVICES  |   ABOUT US  |   SEARCH