The Physician and Sportsmedicine
Menubar About Us Advertiser Services CME Resource Center Personal Health Journal Home

Detecting and Treating Shoulder Impingement Syndrome

The Role of Scapulothoracic Dyskinesis

Michael J. DePalma, MD; Ernest W. Johnson, MD

THE PHYSICIAN AND SPORTSMEDICINE - VOL 31 - NO. 7 - JULY 2021


In Brief: The shoulder joint is most appropriately referred to as the "shoulder complex," since its total range of motion depends on four interworking articulations. The scapula is central in proficient shoulder activity, and rotator cuff muscles will not operate optimally if the scapula is poorly positioned. Dynamic scapular stabilization requires coordinated muscular activity, and muscle dysfunction will lead to glenohumeral incongruity during overhead athletic activities. Lack of scapular protraction, upward rotation, and posterior tilting can lead to subacromial impingement. Pain inhibition and fatigue can also provoke altered muscle patterns, but rehabilitation exercises can address biomechanic deficiencies.

The shoulder "joint" is mobile and complex, serving as the functional link between the upper limb and trunk when the upper extremity moves during functional tasks.1-5 Hence, the shoulder complex must provide mobility with a stable base of support for the humerus. A relative absence of bony constraints affords this range of motion (ROM) while sacrificing stability. Static and dynamic soft-tissue restraints provide stabilization. The entire shoulder ROM is a function of the dynamic interplay of four separate joints and their muscles and ligaments: the sternoclavicular, acromioclavicular, glenohumeral, and scapulothoracic. Proper shoulder function results in total mobility greater than that of any single articulation, and the structure should more correctly be called the "shoulder complex."1-5

Shoulder complex dysfunction can arise when any of its components malfunctions. A common presentation in overhead athletes can be impingement pain because of subacromial impingement or anterior instability.3,6-8

The role of the scapula and, more important, scapulothoracic dyskinesis in secondary shoulder impingement syndrome has been debated. Scapulothoracic kinematics have been well studied since the 1940s, initially by Inman et al.9 Subsequent descriptive anatomic, neurophysical, and, more recently, three-dimensional analyses have clarified normal and abnormal shoulder complex biomechanics. Clinicians should be aware of the ramifications of scapulothoracic dyskinesis when evaluating patients who have shoulder pain and dysfunction.

Shoulder Anatomy and Physiology

The scapulothoracic articulation (figure 1) incorporates a bone-muscle-bone juncture, with the acromioclavicular joint forming the only true synovial joint.1,3 This configuration allows for smooth gliding motions along the thoracic wall.1,3 The clavicle acts as a strut for the scapula, opposing the medially directed forces of the axioscapular muscles. This arrangement permits scapular rotation and translation along the thoracic cage.3

Force couples. The shoulder complex muscles can be classified by anatomic and functional groupings. The first anatomic group includes the axioscapular muscles that stabilize and rotate the scapula3: the trapezius, rhomboids, levator scapulae, and the serratus anterior. The second anatomic group consists of the extrinsic shoulder girdle muscles: pectoralis major and minor, deltoid, subclavius, biceps, triceps, and the latissimus dorsi.1,3 The final anatomic group consists of the rotator cuff muscles: supraspinatus, infraspinatus, subscapularis, and teres minor.3 The functional groupings are defined by agonists and antagonists working together as force couples.2,9

Movement. The glenohumeral joint ROM is central to the total ROM of the shoulder complex. In healthy patients, less than 1.5 mm of humeral head translation occurs on the glenoid fossa during a 30° arc of motion.10 Therefore, in elevating the arm, the glenohumeral joint has an almost entirely rotational motion at the joint interface.1 Glenohumeral capsule redundancy allows for a wide ROM.

Capsular tightening from torsion provides a stabilizing moment at the extremes of ROM. During external rotation, the anterior capsule and the anterior band of the inferior glenohumeral ligament tighten. During internal rotation, the posterior capsule and posterior band of this ligament tighten. The posterior capsule plays a significant role in preventing anterior glenohumeral translation in abduction.1

Efficient arm elevation necessitates positioning of the humeral head within the shallow glenoid fossa. Rotator cuff muscles plus the deltoid achieve this congruity. As the deltoid contracts, it vertically displaces the humerus. The coupled inferomedially directed forces of the infraspinatus, subscapularis, and teres minor counterbalance this upward force. The supraspinatus contracts to facilitate glenohumeral abduction within the first 75°. As the moment arm of the deltoid improves with further abduction, the supraspinatus compresses the humeral head into the glenoid with a horizontal, medially directed force. The resultant greater force generated by the deltoid continues to abduct the humerus above 90°.1,2,4 Changes in scapular position alter variables for torque about the glenohumeral axis of rotation.

Healthy Scapular Biomechanics

The five individual roles of the scapula have been described by Kibler et al.2 Several different muscles facilitate protraction and retraction around the thoracic cage and upward rotation to elevate the acromion. These overlapping position changes help maintain glenohumeral congruity, keeping the joint as the instantaneous center of rotation (ICR) within the humeral head and preventing translation and soft-tissue strain.

This mobile scapular platform accommodates the humerus in overhead activity, transmitting truncal energy to the upper limb.2,5 Hence, the scapula functions as the kinetic link between proximal segments and the energy released during a serve or pitch.

Scapulothoracic Kinesis in Arm Elevation

The rotations at the glenohumeral and scapulothoracic articulations are largely responsible for humeral abduction and flexion.1,3,4,6,9,10 The overall ratio of glenohumeral to scapulothoracic rotation is 2:1 throughout the full range of elevation. However, most movement occurs at the glenohumeral joint during the first 30° of abduction and the first 60° of flexion at a ratio of 4:1; then it continues at a ratio of 5:4.10

Elevation of the arm also induces a posterior scapular tilting that is defined as the superior scapula and acromion moving away from the greater tuberosity of the humerus while the inferior scapular angle moves toward the rib cage.1,11-13 Such scapular tilting is more prominent during the first 90° of elevation.1,11

ICR movement. Several investigators have demonstrated that the scapular ICR during arm elevation is initially located at the root of the scapular spine during the first 90° to 100° of elevation (figure 2A). The ICR progresses to the acromioclavicular joint as elevation continues above 100°, and this action has been supported by radiologic studies.4

During elevation, the upper trapezius is activated to oppose the lateral pull of the deltoid. The superior fibers of the serratus anterior are activated to maintain proximity between the scapula and thoracic cage and to oppose the pull of the deltoid muscle (figure 2B).

Simultaneously, the rotator cuff muscles are firing to maintain the ICR of the glenohumeral axis, thus exerting a lateral force on the scapula. The combined lateral torque of the serratus anterior and rotator cuff is counterbalanced by the levator scapulae, rhomboids, and lower fibers of the trapezius.14-17 Thus, the lower fibers of the serratus anterior are free to drive the inferior scapular angle laterally, achieving upward scapular rotation about an imaginary axis extending from the sternoclavicular joint to the point of the root of the scapular spine.4,9,14,17,18

ICR and force couples. The rotation about the sternoclavicular and root of the scapular spine axis continues until approximately 100° of glenohumeral abduction, at which point the costoclavicular ligament becomes taut, restricting further upward rotation about this axis. As the serratus anterior continues to contract, the root of the scapular spine glides inferolaterally as the scapula follows its trajectory along the slope of the rib cage.

Consequently, the root of the scapular spine can no longer remain stationary, and so the ICR shifts to the acromioclavicular joint (see figure 2B).1,4,14 Then, the roots of the scapular spine and scapular inferior angle move radially about the acromioclavicular joint until the trapezial ligament becomes taut, restricting further anterolateral excursion of the scapula. At this point, the humeral head is positioned superior to a stable base provided by the glenoid fossa.1,4,14

Abnormal Biomechanics and Impingement Syndrome

Differing views exist about causes of shoulder pain, instability, and impingement. Jobe et al6 suggest that mild anterior glenohumeral instability is a consequence of the progressive attenuation of the static anterior stabilization structures from repetitive throwing. An injurious cycle ensues, with fatigue of dynamic stabilizers leading to further glenohumeral anterior translation and encroachment of the coracoacromial arch.6,7,19

Factors affecting scapular orientation. Scapular malrotation could predispose patients to coracoacromial arch impingement3 and derive from poor scapular positioning in overhead athletic activities.2 Many influences serve to disrupt scapulothoracic rhythm, including pain, soft-tissue stress, and glenohumeral capsular tightness. Typically, muscle dysfunction results from blunt traumatic injury or microtrauma-induced strain and fatigue. Other conditions, such as labral lesions or arthrosis, can lead to pain-inhibited muscle weakness2,16,20 and, in turn, produce poor coordination of shoulder girdle muscles and provoke inefficient scapular stabilization and less torque generation.2,16

Evidence for a scapular role. Descriptive anatomic studies have characterized the relationship between scapular positions and changes in the subacromial space.21-23 Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated a relative decrease in the subacromial space in the sagittal plane with passive scapular protraction in healthy shoulders.21 Thus, without acromial elevation, the humerus approaches the inferior surface of the acromion with the arm in 0° elevation. During active abduction in the scapular plane, patients who had shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS) without MRI evidence of rotator cuff tears or acromioclavicular joint pathology demonstrated reduced acromiohumeral and claviculohumeral distances relative to passive abduction.22

That these observations were made with active arm elevation rather than passive arm elevation points to disrupted force couples as a cause. The lack of anatomic evidence of structural injury to the rotator cuff supports the notion that dyssynergic activity of the shoulder girdle muscle contributes to SIS.19

Shoulder and muscular deficits. Using Moiré topography, Warner et al23 documented a relative asymmetry between the scapulae of shoulders with SIS and healthy contralateral shoulders. These asymmetries were more pronounced during dynamic arm descent from glenohumeral flexion at 90°. All the patients with SIS demonstrated abnormal scapulothoracic rhythm, and none of the subjects had rotator cuff tears. The observation that abnormal scapulothoracic rhythm was significantly worse during eccentric activity of the scapular stabilizers strengthens the argument that scapulothoracic dyskinesis is integral in SIS.

Those with glenohumeral instability who had various labral lesions also demonstrated abnormal scapulothoracic movement. Scapulothoracic dyskinesis is present in conditions such as labral lesions; thus, painful shoulder conditions may disrupt scapulothoracic rhythm, leading to secondary SIS.3,20

Posterior glenohumeral capsule tightness has been documented clinically and experimentally in patients with SIS.19,23,24 An elevated and protracted scapular position may be a compensatory effort to provide functional glenohumeral internal rotation. In athletes who use overhead arm movements, anterior glenohumeral strain and subacromial impingement arise as the scapula becomes more protracted and less able to rotate upward.3,6,25

Altered muscle firing. Methodical studies have identified altered muscle firing patterns as integral in SIS. McQuade et al26 studied healthy subjects and confirmed that fatigue of the axioscapular muscles can result in a destabilized scapula during humeral elevation. Myoelectric signs of fatigue in the upper and lower trapezius and serratus anterior corresponded with a 50% decrement in peak force-generating capacity. The scapular stabilizers are active during humeral elevation and thus are susceptible to fatigue, resulting in altered scapulothoracic kinematics.

Ludewig and Cook27 showed that patients with SIS had increased activation of the upper and lower trapezius and decreased serratus anterior activity compared with patients without SIS. This finding suggests that the trapezius muscle alterations attempt to compensate for the decreased serratus anterior activity to achieve upward scapular rotation. However, the trapezius activity increases were inadequate for posteriorly tilting the scapula during arm elevation.27 Glousman et al16 detected similar muscle findings in throwing athletes with anterior stability.

Scapular tilting. Several studies11-13,27,28 document a relative lack of posterior scapular tilting in SIS patients. The relative anteriorly tilted scapular position seems to predispose patients to SIS12 by causing functional stenosis of the coracoacromial joint. These findings were confirmed by Hebert et al,11 who studied the frontal plane in arm abduction in SIS.

Disruption of the serratus anterior-trapezius force couple allows the inferomedial scapular angle to "float" slightly away from the thoracic cage, causing the acromion to tilt toward the greater tuberosity.11 The greater the decrease in posterior tilting, the greater is the disability.11 Only one small statistically significant difference between the affected and healthy shoulders was detected. However, a large percentage of both shoulders in these patients had scapular rotation amplitudes outside the range of healthy shoulders, suggesting that abnormal scapulothoracic kinetics precede the clinical signs and symptoms of SIS. Thus, scapulothoracic dyskinesis may be a risk factor for developing serratus anterior impingement.11

Clinical Evaluation of Scapulothoracic Rhythm

The clinician should understand the integration of the shoulder complex into the kinetic chain and fully evaluate all factors that can affect scapular function. Thoracic kyphosis can cause relative scapular protraction, and excessive cervical lordosis can alter protraction and retraction.3,29 Oblique pelvic tilts, leg-length discrepancies, and excessive lumbar lordosis can alter the transfer of forces at the shoulder complex.3

Medial and lateral winging. The physician should observe scapular position with the patient at rest and look for obvious winging. Mediosuperior winging is typical of pure serratus anterior paresis consistent with a long-thoracic nerve injury (figure 3A). Trapezius weakness will manifest as lateral winging with an elevated acromion suggestive of spinal accessory nerve injury (figure 3B). The physician should continue to observe as the patient elevates the arm in both flexion and abduction in the frontal plane and look for asymmetry, especially in the descending phases.

Recently, Kibler et al28 have documented three distinct patterns of scapulothoracic dyskinesis. Type 1 scapulothoracic dyskinesis manifests prominence of the inferomedial scapular border, type 2 exhibits prominence of the entire medial scapular border, and type 3 is characterized by superior medial border prominence.28 One can manually assist the symptomatic side by applying upward and laterally directed force to the inferior angle of the scapula and assessing for amelioration of impingement symptoms.3,8 A provocative maneuver can be used to assess the scapular stabilizers' conditioning: A patient's inability to pinch the scapulae together in retraction for more than 15 seconds before experiencing muscular burning suggests premature fatigue of these muscles.3

Lateral slide test. This reliable and reproducible test can quantitatively measure scapular asymmetry and accurately evaluate the moving scapular landmarks and scapular muscles.3 The examiner measures the distance between the inferior angle of the scapula and the adjacent spinous process in three different arm positions: (1) with the arm at the side, (2) with the patient's hand on his or her iliac crest, and (3) with the arm abducted 90° in the coronal plane.

Shoulders of healthy patients show decreased asymmetry as they progress from the first to third position. However, in injured shoulders, the asymmetry persists and increases, with a difference of 1.5 cm or more indicating an abnormality.3 Moiré topography is more sensitive than physical examination for detecting asymmetric scapular positions, but this technique is much less practical, because it requires special equipment and trained personnel.3,23

Restoration of Normal Scapulothoracic Kinesis

Successful rehabilitation of shoulder disorders addresses all the abnormalities discovered during the physical examination.3 Lumbar or thoracic strength deficits must be addressed with strengthening exercises for trunk flexors, extensors, and rotators. Postural abnormalities and anteroposterior and rotational inflexibilities must be corrected, and efficient biomechanics must be restored.3,5 These exercises can overlap the initiation of scapulothoracic exercises.

Guiding rehabilitation. Scapular rehabilitation is divided into three stages: stability exercises, closed-chain exercises, and open-chain exercises.2,3 Initially, external assistance with scapular control can alleviate impingement pain, assist the function of the scapular stabilizers, and reduce injurious stretching of important stabilizing muscles.3,8 Such devices include taping techniques and posterior support braces such as figure-eight clavicle collars.3,8 These devices help restore normal positioning and stimulate coordination of muscle firing patterns.3,15 Isometric exercises such as scapular pinch and shrug are introduced in sets of low repetitions (three to five) to reduce overload stress and to encourage repair.3,8

Closed-kinetic-chain activities provide the most physiologic way to reestablish normal motor firing patterns.3 The patient uses the wall and, when exercising on all fours, uses the floor and moves through scapular elevation, depression, protraction, and retraction with the arm at 90° elevation and the elbow extended. This positioning best simulates normal functional patterns and elicits physiologic patterns of shoulder girdle muscle co-contractions.3

Once these exercises are mastered, the patient can progress to more complex movements. Some researchers17 suggest the use of four core exercises to target the scapular stabilizers: scaption (humeral elevation in the scapular plane), rowing, push-ups with terminal scapular protraction, and press-ups.

Moseley et al17 observed peak activity of the serratus anterior during glenohumeral flexion, scaption with glenohumeral internal rotation, and abduction. The inferior serratus anterior fibers exhibited peak activity at the bottom of the push-up with terminal protraction movement.17 Therefore, emphasis of the eccentric component of scapular movement as the chest nears the floor is pertinent.

Progression and return of function. Once patients establish foundations with the isometric and closed-chain activities, they can progress to open-chain exercises. Restoration of healthy scapulothoracic rhythm is required for progression. If less than 1 cm of asymmetry is present between the inferior angles in the third position and the scapula ascends and descends smoothly during arm elevation, then scapular stability has improved.3

Open-chain exercises incorporate proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation patterns and plyometric activities to condition the scapular stabilizers for return to play or other functional activities. Plyometric muscle activities, such as throwing an air-filled ball, provide dynamic stabilization challenges to the shoulder complex muscles. These conditioning and retraining activities restore the scapulothoracic kinetics for sport-specific or functional activities.2,3 Once the scapular base has been stabilized, patients can transition to restorative training for rotator cuff muscles.

The Rehabilitative Wrap

Evaluating the relative contribution of scapulothoracic dyskinesis can be elusive. Assessing the predisposing shoulder complex characteristics is imperative to obtaining functional restoration. The musculoskeletal specialist should always start with the scapular base in patients who have shoulder pain. Only after proficient scapular stabilization is restored should treatment focus on rotator cuff or distal upper-limb dysfunction.

References

  1. Della Valle CJ, Rokito AS, Birdzell MG, et al: Biomechanics of the shoulder, in Nordin M, Frankel VH (eds): Basic Biomechanics of the Musculoskeletal System. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2021, pp 318-339
  2. Kibler WB, Herring SA, Press JM: Rehabilitation of the shoulder, in Kibler WB, Herring SA, Press JM, et al: Functional Rehabilitation of Sports and Musculoskeletal Injuries. Gaithersburg, MD, Aspen, 192021, pp 149-170
  3. Kibler WB: The role of the scapula in athletic shoulder function. Am J Sports Med 192021;26(2):325-337
  4. Dvir Z, Berme N: The shoulder complex in elevation of the arm: a mechanism approach. J Biomech 1978;11(5):219-225
  5. Jobe FW, Moynes DR, Brewster CE: Rehabilitation of shoulder joint instabilities. Orthop Clin North Am 120217;18(3):473-482
  6. Jobe FW, Kvitne RS, Giangarra CE: Shoulder pain in the overhand or throwing athlete: the relationship of anterior instability and rotator cuff impingement. Orthop Rev 120219;18(9):963-975
  7. Sauers EL: Theories on throwing injuries diverge from book of Jobe. Biomechanics 2021;8(11):61-70
  8. Schmitt L, Snyder-Mackler L: Role of scapular stabilizers in etiology and treatment of impingement syndrome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1999;29(1):31-38
  9. Inman VT, Saunders JB, Abbott LC: Observations of the function of the shoulder joint, 1944. Clin Orthop 1996; 330(Sep):3-12
  10. Poppen NK, Walker PS: Normal and abnormal motion of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976;58(2):195-201
  11. Hebert LJ, Moffet H, MacFadyen BJ, et al: Scapular behavior in shoulder impingement syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2021;83(1):60-69
  12. Lukasiewicz AC, McClure P, Michener L, et al: Comparison of 3-dimensional scapular position and orientation between subjects with and without shoulder impingement. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1999;29(10):574-583
  13. McClure PW, Michener LA, Sennett BJ, et al: Direct 3-dimensional measurement of scapular kinematics during dynamic movements in vivo. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021;10(3):269-277
  14. Bagg SD, Forrest WJ: Electromyographic study of the scapular rotators during arm abduction in the scapular plane. Am J Phys Med 120216;65(3):111-124
  15. Nuber GW, Jobe FW, Perry J, et al: Fine wire electromyography analysis of muscles of the shoulder during swimming. Am J Sports Med 120216;14(1):7-11
  16. Glousman R, Jobe F, Tibone J, et al: Dynamic electromyographic analysis of the throwing shoulder with glenohumeral instability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 120218;70(2):220-226
  17. Moseley JB Jr, Jobe FW, Pink M, et al: EMG analysis of the scapular muscles during a shoulder rehabilitation program. Am J Sports Med 1992;20(2):128-134
  18. Shah K, Stefaniwsky L: Long thoracic nerve palsy: case report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 120212;63(11):585-586
  19. Warner JJ, Micheli LJ, Arslanian LE, et al: Patterns of flexibility, laxity, and strength in normal shoulders and shoulders with instability and impingement. Am J Sports Med 1990;18(4):366-375
  20. Burkhart SS, Morgan CD, Kibler WB: Shoulder injuries in overhead athletes: the 'dead arm' revisited. Clin Sports Med 2021;19(1):125-158
  21. Solem-Bertoft E, Thuomas KA, Westerberg CE: The influence of scapular retraction and protraction on the width of the subacromial space: an MRI study. Clin Orthop 1993;296(Nov):99-103
  22. Graichen H, Bonel H, Stammberger T, et al: Three-dimensional analysis of the width of the subacromial space in healthy subjects and patients with impingement syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172(4):1081-1086
  23. Warner JJ, Micheli LJ, Arslanian LE, et al: Scapulothoracic motion in normal shoulders and shoulders with glenohumeral instability and impingement syndrome: a study using Moiré topographic analysis. Clin Orthop 1992;285(Dec):191-199
  24. Tyler TF, Nicholas SJ, Roy T, et al: Quantification of posterior capsule tightness and motion loss in patients with shoulder impingement. Am J Sports Med 2021;28(5):668-673
  25. Rupp S, Berninger K, Hopf T: Shoulder problems in high level swimmers: impingement, anterior instability, muscular imbalance? Int J Sports Med 1995;16(8):557-562
  26. McQuade KJ, Dawson J, Smidt GL: Scapulothoracic muscle fatigue associated with alterations in scapulohumeral rhythm kinematics during maximum resistive shoulder elevation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 192021;28(2):74-80
  27. Ludewig PM, Cook TM: Alterations in shoulder kinematics and associated muscle activity in people with symptoms of shoulder impingement. Phys Ther 2021;80(3):276-291
  28. Kibler WB, Uhl TL, Maddux JW, et al: Qualitative clinical evaluation of scapular dysfunction: a reliability study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021:11(6):550-556
  29. Kebaetse M, McClure P, Pratt NA: Thoracic position effect on shoulder range of motion, strength, and three-dimensional scapular kinematics. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80(8):945-950


Dr DePalma is chief resident and Dr Johnson is professor emeritus in the department of physical medicine and rehabilitation at The Ohio State University in Columbus. Address correspondence to Michael J. DePalma, MD, Dodd Hall, 480 W 9th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210; e-mail to [email protected].

Disclosure information: Drs DePalma and Johnson disclose no significant relationship with any manufacturer of any commercial product mentioned in this article. No drug is mentioned in this article for an unlabeled use.


RETURN TO JULY 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS

HOME  |   JOURNAL  |   PERSONAL HEALTH  |   RESOURCE CENTER  |   CME  |   ADVERTISER SERVICES  |   ABOUT US  |   SEARCH